SQLPro for MSSQL vs SQL Server Management Studio

SSMS is the gold standard for SQL Server on Windows. SQLPro for MSSQL brings a comparable experience to macOS and iOS.

---

Feature Comparison

Feature	SQLPro for MSSQL	SSMS
Architecture	Native (Swift/Obj-C)	Native (.NET/WPF)
macOS	✓	✗
iOS / iPadOS	✓	✗
Windows	✓	✓
Linux	✗	✗
Query editor with autocomplete	✓	✓
Multiple result sets	✓	✓
GO batch separator	✓	✓
Object Explorer / sidebar tree	✓	✓
Table designer	✓	✓
Stored procedures / functions	✓	✓
SSH tunneling	✓	✗
Import from CSV / JSON	✓	✓
Export to CSV / JSON / XML	✓	✓
Execution plan viewer	✗	✓
Activity monitor	✗	✓
SSIS / SSRS integration	✗	✓
Database diagrams	✗	✓
Dark mode	✓	✓
Price	Subscription or lifetime	Free

Why Mac users need an alternative to SSMS

SQL Server Management Studio is the most complete SQL Server tool available, but it only runs on Windows. For Mac users, that traditionally meant running a Windows virtual machine through Parallels or VMware -- consuming gigabytes of disk space and RAM just to run a database client.

SQLPro for MSSQL provides a native macOS experience for the most common SQL Server tasks: writing and executing queries, browsing database objects, editing table data, and managing stored procedures. It launches in under a second and uses a fraction of the resources a virtual machine would consume.

What SSMS does better

SSMS remains the best choice for SQL Server administration tasks: execution plan analysis, Activity Monitor, SQL Server Agent job management, SSIS/SSRS integration, and database diagrams. If you need these capabilities regularly, SSMS is the right tool.

For day-to-day development work -- writing queries, browsing data, editing stored procedures -- SQLPro for MSSQL covers the workflow without requiring Windows.

SSH tunneling: a feature SSMS lacks

SQLPro for MSSQL supports SSH tunneling out of the box, allowing you to connect to SQL Server instances behind firewalls without configuring a VPN. SSMS does not have built-in SSH support -- you would need a separate SSH client or VPN connection.

Migrating from SSMS to SQLPro for MSSQL

If you are moving from a Windows development environment to macOS, the transition from SSMS to SQLPro for MSSQL is straightforward. Connection details (server address, port, authentication) work identically. The Object Explorer maps to SQLPro's sidebar tree. Query tabs, the GO batch separator, and keyboard shortcuts like Cmd+E to execute (instead of F5) follow familiar patterns.

You can export your SSMS connections list and recreate them in SQLPro for MSSQL. iCloud Keychain then syncs your connections across your Mac, iPhone, and iPad -- something SSMS cannot do since it has no mobile version.

When you need both

Many developers keep SSMS available through a lightweight Windows VM or Remote Desktop for the occasional administration task (execution plans, SQL Agent jobs, SSIS packages), while using SQLPro for MSSQL as their daily driver for query writing and data management. This hybrid approach gives you the best of both worlds without running a heavy VM full-time.

T-SQL feature support

Both tools support the full T-SQL language, including stored procedures, functions, triggers, CTEs, window functions, and MERGE statements. SSMS adds IntelliSense with parameter info and function signatures. SQLPro for MSSQL provides autocomplete for table names, column names, and SQL keywords, which covers the vast majority of daily query writing needs.

For script execution, both tools support the GO batch separator, multi-statement scripts, and transaction management (BEGIN TRAN / COMMIT / ROLLBACK). SQLPro for MSSQL displays multiple result sets simultaneously, matching the SSMS behavior that SQL Server developers rely on.

Connection management

SSMS stores connections locally in Windows. SQLPro for MSSQL stores connections in iCloud Keychain, which syncs them across your Mac, iPhone, and iPad automatically. This means you can set up a connection once on your Mac and it appears on your iPad without manual configuration. For teams, both tools support connecting to the same server -- there is no conflict in using both simultaneously.

View all comparisons